Share

The Australian Energy Council (AEC) has voiced its concern about the Victorian Government’s plan to develop a large-scale battery in Geelong, stating that without independent regulation of costs it is a ‘bad idea’.

The AEC’s Chief Executive, Sarah McNamara, said it is unclear how costs will be passed on to end users, or if any detailed cost-benefit analysis has been undertaken.

“The AEC supports private investment in response to market signals, however this battery will be funded by Victorian consumers whether or not it proves useful,” Ms McNamara said. 

“It is being developed under new legislation that allows the Victorian Minister to direct such developments outside the national planning and regulatory framework. 

“It will also impact private investment decisions made in good faith within that framework.

“Every decision like this unavoidably affects market investments so careful individual assessments should be carried out at arms-length from political decisions.

“This is critical to ensure not just the timing, but also the cost-effectiveness for customers who have to pay for new investments, as well as providing a predictable framework for generation investors.

“This is why we do not support the Victorian approach.

“While it is clear this battery will participate in the energy market, it is not clear who will make decisions on when or how it will be used, which will unavoidably affect other market participants.”

The Australian Energy Market Operator has neither identified a shortfall in Victorian supply for 2021-22, nor has it identified a need for this battery in its national Integrated System Plan.

Related articles
1 Comment
  1. Jayaram Iyengar 3 years ago

    I fully agree that this approval requires a fully transparent cost benefit analysis and how much the consumers are charged ? is it required? has AEMO agreed ?, will this help Grid security under essential services act? This is a critical infrastruture which may benefit more in the sunbelt Mildura area where Solar energy generators are being constrained to restrict power feed due to GRID capacity. PV magazine must ask questions, State shadow Energy minister must ask questions, Green state MP & senator must ask questions and remove the power from the minister.
    “It is being developed under new legislation that allows the Victorian Minister to direct such developments outside the national planning and regulatory framework.
    “It will also impact private investment decisions made in good faith within that framework.
    “Every decision like this unavoidably affects market investments so careful individual assessments should be carried out at arms-length from political decisions.
    “This is critical to ensure not just the timing, but also the cost-effectiveness for customers who have to pay for new investments, as well as providing a predictable framework for generation investors.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

©2023 Energy Magazine. All rights reserved

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?